Hi everyone,

I am using wordpress and wp-theme skybrown. I have made some changes in a theme (erased google ads, codes for embedded video etc.)… and now when I write post or page, tag <strong> is not working, so text is normal, although it should be bold…
URL is: http://www.spgsberoun.cz/
I would be grateful fotr any ideas…
Thanks in advance!!!
p.

Good Day!

Not sure how you are using the <strong> tag, however looking at your CSS file I personally didn’t notice any resets in it. I might be wrong, but I would look through your CSS file once again and see if there is a reset for it. Also, don’t kill me for this but if you are using the tag incorrectly it will not show up as you expect. Here is the correct usage, I’m sure you know about it;

Examples of where you are using this exactly would help.

Thank you,

Can you please copy & paste the part of your code that is using the STRONG tag so we can see?

Thanks.

------------------
I Need Money

punc00

If your problem is not solved yet,
feel free to contact our website company,
provide our experts with a more detailed information,
and they will be glad to help you

__________________
http://www.websitetemplates.bz

Hey pretty sure it’s all working fine?

Can anyone please explain whats the difference between bold tag and strong tag ?

Bold was used in HTML versions. Now, in XHTML, bold is deprecated and we use strong. The difference is nothing but if you try to validate your XHTML code into the w3 validator it won’t.

Sorry for my bad english,

----------------------------

Diseño web Castellón

That’s strange. But, sometimes a font can be the perfect size such that bold characters won’t show up - they are there but they look the same. As an experiment, change your font to Verdana or something else and see if they appear vajina estetiği. It’s purely a css issue cinsel organ estetiği...you just need to figure out the nuance here labioplasti, vajina daraltma.

This is an ongoing discussion in various fora including WebmasterWorld estetik.

From a semantic standpoint, <em> and <strong> are the correct elements to use when something needs to be emphasized or strongly emphasized.

But, here is where the problem comes in. Many don’t know the meaning behind those two elements. The new WYSIWYG programs are now wrapping elements in <strong> when in fact they should probably be styled using a <span> element so the meaning is not misinterpreted web tasarım.

I can see it now, 2011 will be a <strong> year for many. I can’t emphasize how <strong> it will be. ;)

P.S. I use all four of the elements. I used <i> and <b> for visual clues and then <em> and <strong> when I want a semantic clue. ;)
http://www.nevarsa.com

the right should be

_____________________________________
Gadget Reviews New Laptop Season Episode Upright Chest Freezers

trader - 24 January 2011 09:18 AM

This is an ongoing discussion in various fora including WebmasterWorld.

From a semantic standpoint, <em> and <strong> are the correct elements to use when something needs to be emphasized or strongly emphasized.

But, here is where the problem comes in. Many don’t know the meaning behind those two elements. The new WYSIWYG programs are now wrapping elements in <strong> when in fact they should probably be styled using a <span> element so the meaning is not misinterpreted.

I can see it now, 2011 will be a <strong> year for many. I can’t emphasize how <strong> it will be. ;)

P.S. I use all four of the elements. I used <i> and <b> for visual clues and then <em> and <strong> when I want a semantic clue. ;)

thanks, thats inspire me!, but i often use <b> XD
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-==........Joe Love Google..........==-

One way of working out what is semantically most appropriate is to imagine what a screen reader would do. It will read a <b> tag in a normal voice, but it will emphasise a <strong> tag with a “bigger” voice burun estetiği. So now we know what each tag means domain.... of course, as was said above, it’s a good idea to use CSS to bold a whole chunk of text estetik cerrahi.
The same principles apply to <i> and <em> tags. They look the same, but they sound different in a screen reader (<i> is a normal voice, <em> is emphasised).

Here is an example: The Australian government organisation HealthConnect uses italics for the second half of the name (don’t ask me why, it’s just their branding decision şiir). The correct way to mark this up is to use <i> tags for the Connect part of HealthConnect, because we want it to look different but we don’t want it to sound different satılık emlak ilanları
Thanks in advance..

ProfMoriarty, there is some sense in making a “bold” class when you want to avoid hardcoding a particular style into the HTML, as whilst with CSS you could always do a b {font-weight:normal;} later, for non-CSS user agents, the bold will always show göğüs estetiği.
However, that is not always a problem, so in those cases, using

is a good idea rather than <span class="bold"></span> burun estetiği.

One other advantage of

and with the CSS:

b.date {
font-weight:normal;
color:red;
}

saç ekimi

As your date is not important, you don’t want to use a hx heading, but if you used a <span>, it would remain indistinguishable from a normal paragraph in a non-CSS environment vajina daraltma.

I would definitely be using <b></b> as well.

Online Marketing

plastik - 27 January 2011 10:39 AM

ProfMoriarty, there is some sense in making a “bold” class when you want to avoid hardcoding a particular style into the HTML, as whilst with CSS you could always do a b {font-weight:normal;} later, for non-CSS user agents, the bold will always show göğüs estetiği.
However, that is not always a problem, so in those cases, using

<b></b>

is a good idea rather than <span class="bold"></span> burun estetiği.

One other advantage of

<b> and <i> are that, because they are semantically meaningless, you can use them as replacements for <span> whilst still making that style distinction for non-CSS user agents. Heres a (rather poor) example: 

<h1>My title</h1>
<h2>My subtitle</h2>
<p>Date of publication: <b class="date">January 1st, 2005</b></p>

and with the CSS:

b.date {
font-weight:normal;
color:red;
}

As your date is not important, you don’t want to use a hx heading, but if you used a <span>, it would remain indistinguishable from a normal paragraph in a non-CSS environment vajina daraltma.

So that gives an idea to blind readers what the paragraph is supposed to look like, or by speaking out how the text is styled, one might come to a conclusion that otherwise can only be drawn when semantically correct markup is being used göğüs estetiği.

Does that make sense? Man, I am not used to write English anymore when I am that tired göğüs küçültme:-)

Anyhow, I’d go with semantically correct markup whenever possible (err, always), and try to avoid stuff like <b> or <i>.

I just wanted to share my experiences with screen readers. Some of them are capable of telling the blind reader how the text looks like göğüs dikleştirme. It seems to be in the settings though, so screen reader users can enable or disable these functions jinekomasti.

I like the site. I don’t think you have to make any changes. The layout is good, the color scheme is good and the logo is also good.
_____________________________
Sudoku - Flash Game - Flash Game
Flash Game - xnxx - Flash Game